@article{Liu20234815,

title = {International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023},

author = {Rong Liu and Mohammed Abu Hilal and Go Wakabayashi and Ho-Seong Han and Chinnusamy Palanivelu and Ugo Boggi and Thilo Hackert and Hong-Jin Kim and Xiao-Ying Wang and Ming-Gen Hu and Gi Hong Choi and Fabrizio Panaro and Jin He and Mikhail Efanov and Xiao-Yu Yin and Roland S. Croner and Yu-Man Fong and Ji-Ye Zhu and Zheng Wu and Chuan-Dong Sun and Jae Hoon Lee and Marco V. Marino and Iyer Shridhar Ganpati and Peng Zhu and Zi-Zheng Wang and Ke-Hu Yang and Jia Fan and Xiao-Ping Chen and Wan Yee Lau},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85170421518&doi=10.3748%2fwjg.v29.i32.4815&partnerID=40&md5=92dbb5eef5141f417941671602e6700a},

doi = {10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815},

issn = {10079327},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-01-01},

urldate = {2023-01-01},

journal = {World Journal of Gastroenterology},

volume = {29},

number = {32},

pages = {4815 – 4830},

publisher = {Baishideng Publishing Group Inc},

abstract = {The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts’ opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future. ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.},

note = {Cited by: 0; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Liu20191432,

title = {International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018},

author = {Rong Liu and Go Wakabayashi and Hong-Jin Kim and Gi-Hong Choi and Anusak Yiengpruksawan and Yuman Fong and Jin He and Ugo Boggi and Roberto I. Troisi and Mikhail Efanov and Daniel Azoulay and Fabrizio Panaro and Patrick Pessaux and Xiao-Ying Wang and Jia Fan and Ji-Ye Zhu and Shao-Geng Zhang and Chuan-Dong Sun and Zheng Wu and Kai-Shan Tao and Ke-Hu Yang and Xiao-Ping Chen},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063673983&doi=10.3748%2fwjg.v25.i12.1432&partnerID=40&md5=afeccf037878db987281db8a3aff459e},

doi = {10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432},

issn = {10079327},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {World Journal of Gastroenterology},

volume = {25},

number = {12},

pages = {1432 – 1444},

publisher = {Baishideng Publishing Group Co},

abstract = {The robotic surgical system has been applied in liver surgery. However, controversies concerns exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. To promote the development of robotic hepatectomy, this study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic hepatectomy and provide sixty experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 22 topics were prepared analyzed and widely discussed during the 4 meetings. Based on the published articles and expert panel opinion, 7 recommendations were generated by the GRADE method using an evidence-based method, which focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatectomy. Given that the current evidences were low to very low as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized-controlled trials are needed in the future to validate these recommendations. © The Author(s) 2019.},

note = {Cited by: 70; All Open Access, Green Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}