@article{Pitt20201655,

title = {IHPBA: the first 25 years},

author = {Henry A. Pitt},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85088110322&doi=10.1016%2fj.hpb.2020.06.008&partnerID=40&md5=5671c0577e966e9c038eb69cc33a6f3d},

doi = {10.1016/j.hpb.2020.06.008},

issn = {1365182X},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-01},

urldate = {2020-01-01},

journal = {HPB},

volume = {22},

number = {12},

pages = {1655 – 1666},

publisher = {Elsevier B.V.},

abstract = {Background: The International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) was established in 1994. In the prior 16 years, considerable international hepatic, pancreatic and biliary association activity had been undertaken. In the subsequent 25 years, the association has grown and evolved dramatically. The aim of this historical account is to document how the IHPBA has advanced from 1994 through 2019. Methods: Original materials written by the founders of the precursor societies and Regional Associations were collected. Input from the first five Secretary Generals was solicited. Numerous documents provided by the Management Associations were gathered. Results: The IHPBA's origins, vision and mission are documented. The leadership, committee evolution and World Congresses are chronicled. The Regional Associations, National Chapters, membership growth and logos are detailed. The IHPBA's official journal, HBP, and learning platform, myHPB, are discussed. The Warren Fellowship and the IHPBA's Foundation are described. The education and training, research and outreach missions are reported. The HPB Medallion recipients are acknowledged. The financial growth, corporate partners and harmonization efforts are documented. Thoughts about the future are expressed. Conclusion: In 25 years, the IHPBA has matured into an international organization devoted to relief of worldwide suffering caused by hepato-pancreato-biliary disorders by improving education, training and patient care. © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc.},

note = {Cited by: 1; All Open Access, Bronze Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Kokudo2020109,

title = {The history of liver surgery: Achievements over the past 50 years},

author = {Norihiro Kokudo and Nobuyuki Takemura and Kyoji Ito and Fuminori Mihara},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083538855&doi=10.1002%2fags3.12322&partnerID=40&md5=6818a845ea259af6a95ff4d0da624687},

doi = {10.1002/ags3.12322},

issn = {24750328},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-01},

urldate = {2020-01-01},

journal = {Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery},

volume = {4},

number = {2},

pages = {109 – 117},

publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd},

abstract = {We reviewed the progress made in the field of liver surgery over the past 50 years. The widespread use and improved outcomes of the hepatectomy were, primarily, due to pioneer surgeons who were responsible for technological advances and rapid improvements in the safety of the procedure in the last century. These advances included the hepatic functional evaluation used to determine the safety limit of liver resections, the introduction of intraoperative ultrasonography, and the development of innovative techniques such as portal vein embolization to increase the remnant liver volume. Cadaveric liver transplantation has been attempted since 1963. However, the clinical outcomes only began improving and becoming acceptable in the 1970s-1980s due to refinements in technology and the development of new immunosuppressants. Partial liver transplantation from living donors, which was first attempted in 1988, required further technological innovation and sophisticated perioperative management plans. Moreover, these developments allowed for further overall improvements to take place in the field of liver surgery. Since the turn of the century, advances in computation and imaging technology have made it possible for safer and more elaborate surgeries to be performed. In Japan, preoperative 3-dimensional simulation technology has been covered by health insurance since 2012 and is now widely used. An urgent need for real-time navigation tools will develop in the future. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging was first used in 2007 and has led to the creation of a new surgical concept known as fluorescence navigation surgery. Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery have solved the issue of large incisions, which used to be a major drawback of open liver surgery; however, further improvements are required in order to achieve the level of safety and accuracy observed during open liver resection when performing all minimally invasive procedures. In the near future, liver surgery will become more precise and less invasive due to substantial progress including the development of navigation surgery, cancer imaging, and minimally invasive surgery. This overview of the history of liver surgery over the past 50 years may provide useful insights for further innovation in the next 50 years. © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology},

note = {Cited by: 19; All Open Access, Gold Open Access, Green Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{LS5143,

title = {Historical evolution and current state of robotic liver surgery},

author = {Iswanto Sucandy and Andres Giovannetti},

url = {https://ls.amegroups.com/article/view/5143},

doi = {10.21037/ls.2019.05.04},

issn = {2616-4221},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {Laparoscopic Surgery},

volume = {3},

number = {0},

abstract = {In the 1980s, ‘open’ liver resection was known to be associated with prohibitively high morbidity and mortality. Several reasons for the poor outcomes were complex vascular and biliary structures within the liver, difficulty in anatomical exposure, and tendency for major bleeding to occur during parenchymal transection. With advancement of surgical techniques, better instrumentation for hemostasis, and improved perioperative care, the feasibility and safety of liver resection improved significantly. Cure from hepatocellular carcinoma now became a reality for many patients, who were otherwise facing a death sentence (1,2).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Nagino2019598,

title = {Fifty-year history of biliary surgery},

author = {Masato Nagino},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083539590&doi=10.1002%2fags3.12289&partnerID=40&md5=2a8d6f3e7351e47d8dd9204fb7964c3b},

doi = {10.1002/ags3.12289},

issn = {24750328},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery},

volume = {3},

number = {6},

pages = {598 – 605},

publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd},

abstract = {There has been enormous progress in the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancers in the past 50 years. In preoperative management, biliary drainage methods have changed from percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, while the advent of multidetector-row computed tomography in imaging diagnostics now enables visualization of three-dimensional anatomy, extent of cancer progression, and hepatic segment volume. Portal vein embolization has also greatly improved the safety of extended hepatectomy, and indication of extended hepatectomy can now be objectively determined with a combination of the indocyanine green test and computed tomography volumetry. In terms of surgery, combined resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and/or hepatic artery can now be safely carried out at specialized centers. Further, long-term survival can be attained with combined vascular resection if R0 resection can be achieved, even in locally advanced cancer. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy, combined major hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy, should be aggressively carried out for laterally advanced cholangiocarcinoma, whereas its indication for advanced gallbladder cancer should be carefully evaluated. Japanese surgeons have made a significant contribution to the progression of extended surgeries such as combined vascular resection and hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary tract cancer. © 2019 The Author. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology},

note = {Cited by: 15; All Open Access, Gold Open Access, Green Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{HBSN3204,

title = {Hepatobiliary surgery: the past, present, and future learned from Professor Henri Bismuth},

author = {Sumihito Tamura and Yasuhiko Sugawara},

url = {https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/3204},

doi = {10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2013.12.01},

issn = {2304-389X},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

urldate = {2014-01-01},

journal = {Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition},

volume = {3},

number = {1},

abstract = {In a recent issue of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition, Science Editor Vicky J. He interviewed Professor Henri Bismuth, a legendary figure in hepatobiliary surgery (1).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{HBSN2322,

title = {Professor Henri Bismuth: the past, present and future of hepatobiliary surgery},

author = {Vicky J. He},

url = {https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/2322},

doi = {10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2013.07.01},

issn = {2304-389X},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

urldate = {2013-01-01},

journal = {Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition},

volume = {2},

number = {4},

abstract = {As a pioneer and renowned international expert in the hepatobiliary field in the early 70’s, Professor Henri Bismuth (Figure 1) was one of the few surgeons in the world (and the first in France) to launch a hepatic transplantation program. In 1993, he set up the first transplant center in France and among the first one in Europe, the Hepatobiliary Center at the Paul Brousse Hospital in Villejuif.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Aragon201228,

title = {Techniques of hepatic resection},

author = {Robert J. Aragon and Naveenraj L. Solomon},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874601355&doi=10.3978%2fj.issn.2078-6891.2012.006&partnerID=40&md5=d6c0cab805ce9e5ea8cb23558290a3c1},

doi = {10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.006},

issn = {20786891},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-01-01},

urldate = {2012-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology},

volume = {3},

number = {1},

pages = {28 – 40},

publisher = {Pioneer Bioscience Publishing},

abstract = {Liver resections are high risk procedures performed by experienced surgeons. The role of liver resection in malignant disease has changed over the last 100 years with great improvement in morbidity, mortality and long term survival. New understanding in liver anatomy, improved perioperative care, anesthesia techniques, and technological advances has improved this aspect of patient care. With improved techniques, patients previously considered unresectable have an opportunity to undergo curative surgery. This review article describes the various approaches and techniques for liver resection. The relevant anatomy and terminology of hepatic resections is discussed, as well as the role of anatomic vs. nonanatomic resection. Methods of vascular control are examined and the multiple strategies of parenchymal transection are compared, as well as minimally-invasive techniques. Finally, a brief review of the authors' practice in terms of surgical technique is offered. © Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company.},

note = {Cited by: 74},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Scalzone201230,

title = {How to transect the liver? A history lasting more than a century},

author = {Rocco Scalzone and Santiago Lopez-Ben and Joan Figueras},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84859027741&doi=10.1159%2f000335719&partnerID=40&md5=bf03d32591ab636844bd04440c1996e7},

doi = {10.1159/000335719},

issn = {02534886},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-01-01},

urldate = {2012-01-01},

journal = {Digestive Surgery},

volume = {29},

number = {1},

pages = {30 – 34},

abstract = {There is a close relationship between blood loss during transection and unfavorable outcome. Many different methods have been used in order to cut the parenchyma, while leaving vital structures intact, coagulate small vessels and seal small biliary ducts. The first method described was the finger-fracture technique and, alternatively, the clamp-crushing method using a small forceps. With this technique, the liver is crushed between the 'jaws', and the vessels and bile ducts are successively ligated and divided. Technological research using different sources of energy developed the water jet dissectors and the ultrasonic dissectors. The CUSA® has been widely adopted for the fascinating way it could selectively destroy and aspirate parenchyma leaving vascular structures almost intact. Several studies have been addressed to clarify these critical points. However, in the majority of cases they are underpowered to demonstrate clear advantages of one method over the others. In conclusion, the evidence suggested no superiority of other techniques over clamp-crushing. But it must be taken into account that it requires strictly hepatic pedicle clamping. The devices available should be used within the limits of each instrument, as well as the surgical skills of the surgeon. Probably the best option should be a combined approach. © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.},

note = {Cited by: 8; All Open Access, Bronze Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Milestones in the Evolution of Hepatic Surgery},

author = {Henri Bismuth and Rony Eshkenazy and Arie Arish},

url = {https://www.rmmj.org.il/userimages/40/0/PublishFiles/40Article.pdf},

doi = {10.5041/RMMJ.10021},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-03},

urldate = {2011-01-03},

journal = { Rambam Maimonides Med J},

volume = {2},

issue = {1},

pages = {e0021},

abstract = {This paper describes the rapid evolution of modern liver surgery, starting in the middle of the twentieth century. Claude Couinaud studied and described the segmental anatomy of the liver, Thomas Starzl performed the first liver transplantations, and Henri Bismuth introduced the concept of anatomical resections. Hepatic surgery has developed significantly since those early days. To date, innovative techniques are applied, using cutting-edge technologies: Intraoperative ultrasound, techniques of vascular exclusion of the liver, new devices for performing homeostasis and dissection, laparoscopy for resections, and new drugs that allow the resection of previously unresectable tumors. The next stage in liver surgery will probably be the implementation of a multidisciplinary holistic approach to the liver-diseased patient that will ensure the best and most efficient treatments in the future.},

note = {Open access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Lehmann2010655,

title = {History of Hepatic Surgery},

author = {Kuno Lehmann and Pierre-Alain Clavien},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77954654791&doi=10.1016%2fj.suc.2010.04.018&partnerID=40&md5=d0885e5c5d91536a4345b8090e64ed41},

doi = {10.1016/j.suc.2010.04.018},

issn = {00396109},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-01},

urldate = {2010-01-01},

journal = {Surgical Clinics of North America},

volume = {90},

number = {4},

pages = {655 – 664},

abstract = {This article describes the development of hepatic surgery from old anecdotes to spectacular progress achieved during the last 25 years. The door to this evolution was opened by anatomists who paved the way for a few courageous hepatic surgeons, who performed pioneering work between 1960 to 1980. Then, hepatic surgery and transplantation became widely accepted for the treatment of many diseases. Surgery on the liver has become safer with low postoperative mortality as a result of the creation of centers of excellence offering multidisciplinary expertise and technical innovation. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.},

note = {Cited by: 10},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{article,

title = {The history of liver surgery, hepatectomy and haemostasis},

author = {Evangelos Felekouras and D. Kaparelos and E. Papalambros},

url = {https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Evangelos-Felekouras/publication/227306103_The_history_of_liver_surgery_hepatectomy_and_haemostasis/links/0fcfd5136269c21600000000/The-history-of-liver-surgery-hepatectomy-and-haemostasis.pdf},

doi = {10.1007/s13126-010-0046-2},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-01},

urldate = {2010-01-01},

journal = {Hellenic Journal of Surgery},

volume = {82},

pages = {280-296},

abstract = {Since ancient times, battle surgeons have debrided small bits of liver protruding through wounds, but it was the advent of general anaesthesia and antisepsis that enabled formal entry into the peritoneal cavity to stop haemorrhage due to trauma or to remove tumours or drain cysts. Important dates in the history of liver resection include 1886 when the first hepatectomy was performed by Lius (the patient bled to death 6 hours later), 1888 when the first successful hepatectomy was carried out by Langenbuch (required further laparotomy for bleeding), 1890 when McLane-Tiffany resected a liver tumour at Johns Hopkins, 1891 when Lucke reported the first successful removal of a malignant liver tumour and 1899 when Keen performed the first anatomic left lateral segmentectomy (sectionectomy). The post World War II era of liver surgery began in 1943, when Cattell performed the first colorectal hepatic metastasectomy at Lahey Clinic, followed by the historical moments of 1952 when the first formal right hepatectomy was done by Lortat-Jacob and Robert in Paris and 1953 when Quattlebaum reported 3 right hepatectomies using dissection with a scalpel handle. In 1958, Lin described the finger fracture technique which probably remains the most popular method of liver dissection up to our day, mainly due to its variations. In the last 60 years, remarkable advances have been made in relation to the techniques of liver resection, our understanding of liver diseases requiring operation, and our ability to support patients through major liver resections. The advances in the modern era include liver dissection technology, preoperative imaging (especially contrast MRI), intraoperative ultrasound scanning, low CVP anaesthesia and finally postoperative high dependency care. Liver transplantation epitomizes the challenges that can now be accepted, and its success foretells a further increase in liver operations in the future. Liver surgery has advanced remarkably, but major challenges remain. These include developing more efficient minimally invasive surgical techniques, improving patient selection for any given treatment modality, and eliminating the risk of recurrence, particularly in the liver. The use of techniques involving virtual reality and robotic surgery is developing. More accurate methods of determining liver functional reserve and investigating liver regeneration are necessary. The application of gene therapy to the management of liver tumours is in its infancy. Finally, in the area of liver transplantation, a solution to tissue tolerance is close and the possibility of xenografts is on the horizon. KeywordsLiver surgery-History-Hepatectomy-Haemostasis},

note = {Open access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Tanabe20081888,

title = {The past 60 years in liver surgery},

author = {Kenneth K. Tanabe},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-53949083082&doi=10.1002%2fcncr.23652&partnerID=40&md5=424130578bb6154b23b68e23a89fe147},

doi = {10.1002/cncr.23652},

issn = {10970142},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-01},

urldate = {2008-01-01},

journal = {Cancer},

volume = {113},

number = {7},

pages = {1888 – 1896},

abstract = {The anniversary of the first publication of Cancer provides an opportunity to review the progress in liver cancer surgery in the past 60 years. Indeed, the past half century has been witness to remarkable advances in liver surgery that have provided benefit to so many patients afflicted with primary or secondary liver tumors. However, no matter now astounding these past achievements may be, it is clear that the future holds even greater promise. © 2008 American Cancer Society.},

note = {Cited by: 12},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Makuuchi19981229,

title = {History of intraoperative ultrasound},

author = {Masatoshi Makuuchi and Guido Torzilli and Junji Machi},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0032194813&doi=10.1016%2fS0301-5629%2898%2900112-4&partnerID=40&md5=8929bb18efd620fbc38c9c060589ea86},

doi = {10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00112-4},

issn = {03015629},

year  = {1998},

date = {1998-01-01},

urldate = {1998-01-01},

journal = {Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology},

volume = {24},

number = {9},

pages = {1229 – 1242},

publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},

abstract = {Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) using A-mode or non-real-time B-mode imaging started in the 1960s; however, it was not widely accepted mainly because of difficulty in image interpretation. In the late 1970s, IOUS became one of the topics in the surgical communities upon the introduction of high-frequency real-time B-mode ultrasound. Special probes for operative use were developed. In the 1980s, all over the world the use of IOUS spread to a variety of surgical fields, such as hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiovascular surgery. IOUS changed hepatic surgery dramatically because IOUS was the only modality that was capable of delineating and examining the interior of the liver during surgery. After 1990, color Doppler imaging and laparoscopic ultrasound were incorporated into IOUS. Currently, IOUS is considered an indispensable operative procedure for intraoperative decision-making and guidance of surgical procedures. For better surgical practice, education of surgeons in the use of ultrasound is the most important issue. Copyright © 1998 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.},

note = {Cited by: 66},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{McCluskyIII1997330,

title = {Hepatic surgery and hepatic surgical anatomy: Historical partners in progress},

author = {David A. McClusky III and Lee J. Skandalakis and Gene L. Colborn and John E. Skandalakis},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031038995&doi=10.1007%2fs002689900238&partnerID=40&md5=1da45735c35ceb4a3269f642c378eea5},

doi = {10.1007/s002689900238},

issn = {03642313},

year  = {1997},

date = {1997-01-01},

urldate = {1997-01-01},

journal = {World Journal of Surgery},

volume = {21},

number = {3},

pages = {330 – 342},

abstract = {Whether for hepatic trauma or transplantation, a surgeon's knowledge of hepatic anatomy commonly determines a patient's outcome. The first medically relevant anatomic studies of the liver emerged with the endeavors of Herophilus and Erasistratus between 310 and 280 BC. Yet it was not until after the development of anesthesia end antisepsis that the first formal resections were performed during the late 1800s. After vascular occlusion principles had been developed as a means of successful hemorrhage control, several deliberate attempts were made to repair the liver surgically. Such efforts culminated in the work of Wendel in 1910 when he followed avascular planes during hepatectomy. The functional anatomy of surgery and surgical technique had suddenly joined in an effort to advance the practice, and eventually the efficacy of hepatic surgeons in facilitating the modern era of segmental anatomy extended hepatectomies and transplantation surgery.},

note = {Cited by: 37},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}