@article{Wakabayashi20226,

title = {The Tokyo 2020 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: Updates of the Brisbane 2000 system},

author = {Go Wakabayashi and Daniel Cherqui and David A. Geller and Mohammed Abu Hilal and Giammauro Berardi and Ruben Ciria and Yuta Abe and Takeshi Aoki and Horacio J. Asbun and Albert C. Y. Chan and Rawisak Chanwat and Kuo-Hsin Chen and Yajin Chen and Tan To Cheung and David Fuks and Naoto Gotohda and Ho-Seong Han and Kiyoshi Hasegawa and Etsuro Hatano and Goro Honda and Osamu Itano and Yukio Iwashita and Hironori Kaneko and Yutaro Kato and Ji Hoon Kim and Rong Liu and Santiago López-Ben and Mamoru Morimoto and Kazuteru Monden and Fernando Rotellar and Yoshihiro Sakamoto and Atsushi Sugioka and Tomoharu Yoshiizumi and Keiichi Akahoshi and Felipe Alconchel and Shunichi Ariizumi and Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra and Manuel Durán and Alain Garcia Vazquez and Nicolas Golse and Yoshihiro Miyasaka and Yasuhisa Mori and Satoshi Ogiso and Chikara Shirata and Federico Tomassini and Takeshi Urade and Taiga Wakabayashi and Hitoe Nishino and Taizo Hibi and Norihiro Kokudo and Masayuki Ohtsuka and Daisuke Ban and Yuichi Nagakawa and Takao Ohtsuka and Minoru Tanabe and Masafumi Nakamura and Akihiko Tsuchida and Masakazu Yamamoto},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123901612&doi=10.1002%2fjhbp.1091&partnerID=40&md5=6f9e9231b8cbd8b84b02db4d4c118e4c},

doi = {10.1002/jhbp.1091},

issn = {18686974},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-01-01},

urldate = {2022-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences},

volume = {29},

number = {1},

pages = {6 – 15},

publisher = {John Wiley and Sons Inc},

abstract = {Background: The Brisbane 2000 Terminology for Liver Anatomy and Resections, based on Couinaud’s segments, did not address how to identify segmental borders and anatomic territories of less than one segment. Smaller anatomic resections including segmentectomies and subsegmentectomies, have not been well defined. The advent of minimally invasive liver resection has enhanced the possibilities of more precise resection due to a magnified view and reduced bleeding, and minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) is becoming popular gradually. Therefore, there is a need for updating the Brisbane 2000 system, including anatomic segmentectomy or less. An online "Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus)" was hosted on February 23, 2021. Methods: The Steering Committee invited 34 international experts from around the world. The Expert Committee (EC) selected 12 questions and two future research topics in the terminology session. The EC created seven tentative definitions and five recommendations based on the experts’ opinions and the literature review performed by the Research Committee. Two Delphi Rounds finalized those definitions and recommendations. Results: This paper presents seven definitions and five recommendations regarding anatomic segmentectomy or less. In addition, two future research topics are discussed. Conclusions: The PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus has presented the Tokyo 2020 Terminology for Liver Anatomy and Resections. The terminology has added definitions of liver anatomy and resections that were not defined in the Brisbane 2000 system. © 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery},

note = {Cited by: 6},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Nagino20211,

title = {Proposal of a New Comprehensive Notation for Hepatectomy: The “New World” Terminology.},

author = {Masato Nagino and Ronald DeMatteo and Hauke Lang and Daniel Cherqui and Massimo Malago and Shoji Kawakatsu and Michelle L. DeOliveira and René Adam and Luca Aldrighetti and Karim Boudjema and William Chapman and Bryan Clary and Eduardo Santibañes and Jiahong Dong and Tomoki Ebata and Itaru Endo and David Geller and Alfredo Guglielmi and Tomoaki Kato and Sung-Gyu Lee and Peter Lodge and Silvio Nadalin and Antonio Pinna and Wojciech Polak and Olivier Soubrane and Pierre-Alain Clavien},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108024104&doi=10.1097%2fSLA.0000000000004808&partnerID=40&md5=9da2460f0c3f3e0fe36fd600e7032d8d},

doi = {10.1097/SLA.0000000000004808},

issn = {15281140},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-01-01},

urldate = {2021-01-01},

journal = {Annals of surgery},

volume = {274},

number = {1},

pages = {1 – 3},

publisher = {NLM (Medline)},

note = {Cited by: 19},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Wang202197,

title = {Consensus Guidelines for the Use of Fluorescence Imaging in Hepatobiliary Surgery},

author = {Xiaoying Wang and Catherine S C Teh and Takeaki Ishizawa and Takeshi Aoki and David Cavallucci and Ser-Yee Lee and Katherine M. Panganiban and Marcos V. Perini and Sudeep R. Shah and Hongguang Wang and Yinzhe Xu and Kyung-Suk Suh and Norihiro Kokudo},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105385798&doi=10.1097%2fSLA.0000000000004718&partnerID=40&md5=a88db25d451b046b430edd839c2dc3ee},

doi = {10.1097/SLA.0000000000004718},

issn = {15281140},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-01-01},

urldate = {2021-01-01},

journal = {Annals of surgery},

volume = {274},

number = {1},

pages = {97 – 106},

publisher = {NLM (Medline)},

abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To establish consensus recommendations for the use of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in hepatobiliary surgery. BACKGROUND: ICG fluorescence imaging has gained popularity in hepatobiliary surgery in recent years. However, there is varied evidence on the use, dosage, and timing of administration of ICG in clinical practice. To standardize the use of this imaging modality in hepatobiliary surgery, a panel of pioneering experts from the Asia-Pacific region sought to establish a set of consensus recommendations by consolidating the available evidence and clinical experiences. METHODS: A total of 13 surgeons experienced in hepatobiliary surgery and/or minimally invasive surgery formed an expert consensus panel in Shanghai, China in October 2018. By the modified Delphi method, they presented the relevant evidence, discussed clinical experiences, and derived consensus statements on the use of ICG in hepatobiliary surgery. Each statement was discussed and modified until a unanimous consensus was achieved. RESULTS: A total of 7 recommendations for the clinical applications of ICG in hepatobiliary surgery were formulated. CONCLUSIONS: The Shanghai consensus recommendations offer practical tips and techniques to augment the safety and technical feasibility of ICG fluorescence-guided hepatobiliary surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy, liver segmentectomy, and liver transplantation. Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},

note = {Cited by: 30},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{pmid33330823,

title = {Effects of volume on outcome in hepatobiliary surgery: a review with guidelines proposal},

author = {Eloisa Franchi and Matteo Donadon and Guido Torzilli},

doi = {10.35772/ghm.2020.01013},

issn = {2434-9194},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-10-01},

urldate = {2020-10-01},

journal = {Glob Health Med},

volume = {2},

number = {5},

pages = {292--297},

abstract = {The positive relationship between volume and outcome in hepatobiliary surgery has been demonstrated for many years. As for other complex surgical procedures, both improved short- and long-term outcomes have been associated with a higher volume of procedures. However, whether the centralization of complex hepatobiliary procedures makes full sense because it should be associated with higher quality of care, as reported in the literature, precise criteria on what to centralize, where to centralize, and who should be entitled to perform complex procedures are still missing. Indeed, despite the generalized consensus on centralization in hepatobiliary surgery, this topic remains very complex because many determinants are involved in such a centralization process, of which some of them cannot be easily controlled. In the context of different health systems worldwide, such as national health systems and private insurance, there are different stakeholders that demand different needs: politicians, patients, surgeons, institutions and medical associations do not always have the same needs. Starting from a review of the literature on centralization in hepatobiliary surgery, we will propose some guidelines that, while not data-driven due to low evidence in the literature, will be based on good clinical practice.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Fang2020437,

title = {Consensus recommendations of three-dimensional visualization for diagnosis and management of liver diseases},

author = {Chihua Fang and Jihyun An and Antonio Bruno and Xiujun Cai and Jia Fan and Jiro Fujimoto and Rita Golfieri and Xishan Hao and Hongchi Jiang and Long R. Jiao and Anand V. Kulkarni and Hauke Lang and Cosmas Rinaldi A. Lesmana and Qiang Li and Lianxin Liu and Yingbin Liu and Wanyee Lau and Qiping Lu and Kwan Man and Hitoshi Maruyama and Cristina Mosconi and Necati Örmeci and Michael Pavlides and Guilherme Rezende and Joo Hyun Sohn and Sombat Treeprasertsuk and Valérie Vilgrain and Hao Wen and Sai Wen and Xianyao Quan and Rafael Ximenes and Yinmo Yang and Bixiang Zhang and Weiqi Zhang and Peng Zhang and Shaoxiang Zhang and Xiaolong Qi},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85087609785&doi=10.1007%2fs12072-020-10052-y&partnerID=40&md5=bcbb629f80465ca27b81b8112b76e9a8},

doi = {10.1007/s12072-020-10052-y},

issn = {19360533},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-01},

urldate = {2020-01-01},

journal = {Hepatology International},

volume = {14},

number = {4},

pages = {437 – 453},

publisher = {Springer},

abstract = {Three-dimensional (3D) visualization involves feature extraction and 3D reconstruction of CT images using a computer processing technology. It is a tool for displaying, describing, and interpreting 3D anatomy and morphological features of organs, thus providing intuitive, stereoscopic, and accurate methods for clinical decision-making. It has played an increasingly significant role in the diagnosis and management of liver diseases. Over the last decade, it has been proven safe and effective to use 3D simulation software for pre-hepatectomy assessment, virtual hepatectomy, and measurement of liver volumes in blood flow areas of the portal vein; meanwhile, the use of 3D models in combination with hydrodynamic analysis has become a novel non-invasive method for diagnosis and detection of portal hypertension. We herein describe the progress of research on 3D visualization, its workflow, current situation, challenges, opportunities, and its capacity to improve clinical decision-making, emphasizing its utility for patients with liver diseases. Current advances in modern imaging technologies have promised a further increase in diagnostic efficacy of liver diseases. For example, complex internal anatomy of the liver and detailed morphological features of liver lesions can be reflected from CT-based 3D models. A meta-analysis reported that the application of 3D visualization technology in the diagnosis and management of primary hepatocellular carcinoma has significant or extremely significant differences over the control group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, recovery of postoperative liver function, operation time, hospitalization time, and tumor recurrence on short-term follow-up. However, the acquisition of high-quality CT images and the use of these images for 3D visualization processing lack a unified standard, quality control system, and homogeneity, which might hinder the evaluation of application efficacy in different clinical centers, causing enormous inconvenience to clinical practice and scientific research. Therefore, rigorous operating guidelines and quality control systems need to be established for 3D visualization of liver to develop it to become a mature technology. Herein, we provide recommendations for the research on diagnosis and management of 3D visualization in liver diseases to meet this urgent need in this research field. © 2020, The Author(s).},

note = {Cited by: 31; All Open Access, Green Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Oldhafer2016839,

title = {ALPPS - Where do we stand, where do we go? Eight recommendations from the first international expert meeting},

author = {Karl J. Oldhafer and Gregor A. Stavrou and Thomas M. Van Gulik and Eduardo De Santibanes and Massimo Malago and Erik Schadde and Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro and Norihiro Kokudo and Thomas A. Aloia and Eddie Abdalla and Michael Linecker and Pierre-Alain Clavien},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84954349162&doi=10.1097%2fSLA.0000000000001633&partnerID=40&md5=ca8561df7687e0cbca254010764f2404},

doi = {10.1097/SLA.0000000000001633},

issn = {00034932},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2016-01-01},

journal = {Annals of Surgery},

volume = {263},

number = {5},

pages = {839 – 841},

publisher = {Lippincott Williams and Wilkins},

note = {Cited by: 72},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Bismuth2013383,

title = {Revisiting liver anatomy and terminology of hepatectomies},

author = {Henri Bismuth},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84873910931&doi=10.1097%2fSLA.0b013e31827f171f&partnerID=40&md5=ff485d490eb33b4bbf7bbf71e1cf8494},

doi = {10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827f171f},

issn = {15281140},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

urldate = {2013-01-01},

journal = {Annals of Surgery},

volume = {257},

number = {3},

pages = {383 – 386},

abstract = {Background:: Since the development of liver surgery, several descriptions of liver anatomical division and hepatectomies have been made, causing some confusion among surgeons. METHODS:: The initial anatomical description according to Couinaud is reviewed and corrected taking into account the descriptions made in the following decades. RESULTS:: It seems that by reviewing the description of the different authors, a precise anatomical division of the liver may be achieved and a simple terminology of hepatectomies may be proposed. CONCLUSIONS:: It is hoped that the proposal of this anatomical description and this terminology of hepatectomies may find a consensus among the liver surgical community from America, Asia, and Europe. © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.},

note = {Cited by: 63},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Koch2011680,

title = {Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery},

author = {Moritz Koch and O. James Garden and Robert Padbury and Nuh N. Rahbari and Rene Adam and Lorenzo Capussotti and Sheung Tat Fan and Yukihiro Yokoyama and Michael Crawford and Masatoshi Makuuchi and Christopher Christophi and Simon Banting and Mark Brooke-Smith and Val Usatoff and Masato Nagino and Guy Maddern and Thomas J. Hugh and Jean-Nicolas Vauthey and Paul Greig and Myrddin Rees and Yuji Nimura and Joan Figueras and Ronald P. Dematteo and Markus W. Büchler and Jürgen Weitz},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79954631448&doi=10.1016%2fj.surg.2010.12.002&partnerID=40&md5=03a3984fc9b28e491c0fc8aea01a094a},

doi = {10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002},

issn = {00396060},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

urldate = {2011-01-01},

journal = {Surgery},

volume = {149},

number = {5},

pages = {680 – 688},

abstract = {Background: Despite the potentially severe impact of bile leakage on patients' perioperative and long-term outcome, a commonly used definition of this complication after hepatobiliary and pancreatic operations has not yet been established. The aim of the present article is to propose a uniform definition and severity grading of bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic operative therapy. Methods: An international study group of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons was convened. A consensus definition of bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic operative therapy was developed based on the postoperative course of bilirubin concentrations in patients' serum and drain fluid. Results: After evaluation of the postoperative course of bilirubin levels in the drain fluid of patients who underwent hepatobiliary and pancreatic operations, bile leakage was defined as bilirubin concentration in the drain fluid at least 3 times the serum bilirubin concentration on or after postoperative day 3 or as the need for radiologic or operative intervention resulting from biliary collections or bile peritonitis. Using this criterion severity of bile leakage was classified according to its impact on patients' clinical management. Grade A bile leakage causes no change in patients' clinical management. A Grade B bile leakage requires active therapeutic intervention but is manageable without relaparotomy, whereas in Grade C, bile leakage relaparotomy is required. Conclusion: We propose a simple definition and severity grading of bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic operative therapy. The application of the present proposal will enable a standardized comparison of the results of different clinical trials and may facilitate an objective evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities in the field of hepatobiliary and pancreatic operative therapy. © 2011 Mosby, Inc.},

note = {Cited by: 922},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Rahbari2011713b,

title = {Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)},

author = {Nuh N. Rahbari and O. James Garden and Robert Padbury and Mark Brooke-Smith and Michael Crawford and Rene Adam and Moritz Koch and Masatoshi Makuuchi and Ronald P. Dematteo and Christopher Christophi and Simon Banting and Val Usatoff and Masato Nagino and Guy Maddern and Thomas J. Hugh and Jean-Nicolas Vauthey and Paul Greig and Myrddin Rees and Yukihiro Yokoyama and Sheung Tat Fan and Yuji Nimura and Joan Figueras and Lorenzo Capussotti and Markus W. Büchler and Jürgen Weitz},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79954634037&doi=10.1016%2fj.surg.2010.10.001&partnerID=40&md5=ee2737ef3993a9fda5725bfeff03d385},

doi = {10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001},

issn = {00396060},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

urldate = {2011-01-01},

journal = {Surgery},

volume = {149},

number = {5},

pages = {713 – 724},

abstract = {Background: Posthepatectomy liver failure is a feared complication after hepatic resection and a major cause of perioperative mortality. There is currently no standardized definition of posthepatectomy liver failure that allows valid comparison of results from different studies and institutions. The aim of the current article was to propose a definition and grading of severity of posthepatectomy liver failure. Methods: A literature search on posthepatectomy liver failure after hepatic resection was conducted. Based on the normal course of biochemical liver function tests after hepatic resection, a simple and easily applicable definition of posthepatectomy liver failure was developed by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Furthermore, a grading of severity is proposed based on the impact on patients' clinical management. Results: No uniform definition of posthepatectomy liver failure has been established in the literature addressing hepatic surgery. Considering the normal postoperative course of serum bilirubin concentration and International Normalized Ratio, we propose defining posthepatectomy liver failure as the impaired ability of the liver to maintain its synthetic, excretory, and detoxifying functions, which are characterized by an increased international normalized ratio and concomitant hyperbilirubinemia (according to the normal limits of the local laboratory) on or after postoperative day 5. The severity of posthepatectomy liver failure should be graded based on its impact on clinical management. Grade A posthepatectomy liver failure requires no change of the patient's clinical management. The clinical management of patients with grade B posthepatectomy liver failure deviates from the regular course but does not require invasive therapy. The need for invasive treatment defines grade C posthepatectomy liver failure. Conclusion: The current definition of posthepatectomy liver failure is simple and easily applicable in clinical routine. This definition can be used in future studies to allow objective and accurate comparisons of operative interventions in the field of hepatic surgery. © 2011 Mosby, Inc.},

note = {Cited by: 1234},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Rahbari2011528,

title = {Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)},

author = {Nuh N. Rahbari and O. James Garden and Robert Padbury and Guy Maddern and Moritz Koch and Thomas J. Hugh and Sheung Tat Fan and Yuji Nimura and Joan Figueras and Jean-Nicolas Vauthey and Myrddin Rees and Rene Adam and Ronald P. Dematteo and Paul Greig and Val Usatoff and Simon Banting and Masato Nagino and Lorenzo Capussotti and Yukihiro Yokoyama and Mark Brooke-Smith and Michael Crawford and Christopher Christophi and Masatoshi Makuuchi and Markus W. Büchler and Jürgen Weitz},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79960563603&doi=10.1111%2fj.1477-2574.2011.00319.x&partnerID=40&md5=192d9ea9c6b2cd47f539e1383e6e191d},

doi = {10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00319.x},

issn = {1365182X},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-01},

urldate = {2011-01-01},

journal = {HPB},

volume = {13},

number = {8},

pages = {528 – 535},

publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd},

abstract = {Background: A standardized definition of post-hepatectomy haemorrhage (PHH) has not yet been established. Methods: An international study group of hepatobiliary surgeons from high-volume centres was convened and a definition of PHH was developed together with a grading of severity considering the impact on patients' clinical management. Results: The definition of PHH varies strongly within the hepatic surgery literature. PHH is defined as a drop in haemoglobin level >3 g/dl post-operatively compared with the post-operative baseline level and/or any post-operative transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) for a falling haemoglobin and/or the need for radiological intervention (such as embolization) and/or re-laparotomy to stop bleeding. Evidence of intra-abdominal bleeding should be obtained by imaging or blood loss via the abdominal drains if present. Transfusion of up to two units of PRBC is considered as being Grade A PHH. Grade B PHH requires transfusion of more than two units of PRBC, whereas the need for invasive re-intervention such as embolization and/ or re-laparotomy defines Grade C PHH. Conclusion: The proposed definition and grading of severity of PHH enables valid comparisons of results from different studies. It is easily applicable in clinical routine and should be applied in future trials to standardize reporting of complications. © 2011 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.},

note = {Cited by: 212; All Open Access, Bronze Open Access, Green Open Access},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Strasberg2005351,

title = {Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: A review of the Brisbane 2000 system},

author = {Steven M. Strasberg},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-27944465366&doi=10.1007%2fs00534-005-0999-7&partnerID=40&md5=40e30476f1199aa456d45f17063fe258},

doi = {10.1007/s00534-005-0999-7},

issn = {09441166},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-01-01},

urldate = {2005-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery},

volume = {12},

number = {5},

pages = {351 – 355},

abstract = {The Brisbane 2000 system of nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections was introduced to provide a universal terminology in an area that was plagued by confusing and inappropriate terminology. The article describes historical developments central to the emergence of the new terminology and describes the terminology, its attributes, and rules of application. © Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005.},

note = {Cited by: 598},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{2000333,

title = {The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of Liver Anatomy and Resections},

author = {S. M. Strasberg and J. Belghiti and P. -A. Clavien and E. Gadzijev and J. O. Garden and W. -Y. Lau and M. Makuuchi and R. W. Strong},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X17307554},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-182X(17)30755-4},

issn = {1365-182X},

year  = {2000},

date = {2000-01-01},

urldate = {2000-01-01},

journal = {HPB},

volume = {2},

number = {3},

pages = {333-339},

abstract = {Background 

The Scientific Committee of the IHPBA, meeting in December 1998, created a Terminology Committee to deal with the confusion in nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and liver resections. A terminology was sought which was anatomically correct, in which anatomical and surgical terms agreed, and which was consistent, self-explanatory, linguistically correct, translatable, precise and concise. 

Discussion 

After 18 months the International Committee presented a terminology that was accepted by the IHPBA at the recent World Congress in Brisbane. The purpose of this paper is to present that terminology.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Bismuth19823,

title = {Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver},

author = {Henri Bismuth},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0020328518&doi=10.1007%2fBF01656368&partnerID=40&md5=a167ed853588202ea3a324c9838386e5},

doi = {10.1007/BF01656368},

issn = {14322323},

year  = {1982},

date = {1982-01-01},

urldate = {1982-01-01},

journal = {World Journal of Surgery},

volume = {6},

number = {1},

pages = {3 – 9},

publisher = {Springer-Verlag},

abstract = {The morphologic anatomy of the liver is described as 2 main and 2 accessory lobes. The more recent functional anatomy of the liver is based on the distribution of the portal pedicles and the location of the hepatic veins. The liver is divided into 4 sectors, some of them composed of 2 segments. In all, there are 8 segments. According to the anatomy, typical hepatectomies (or "réglées") are those which are performed along anatomical scissurae. The 2 main technical conceptions of typical hepatectomies are those with preliminary vascular control (Lortat-Jacob's technique) and hepatectomies with primary parenchymatous transection (Ton That Tung's technique). A good knowledge of the anatomy of the liver is a prerequisite for anatomical surgery of this organ. © 1982 Société Internationale de Chirurgie.},

note = {Cited by: 604},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}